![\"\"](\"https:\/\/icrowdnewswire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/VIPs-Seal-1-2.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/icrowdnewswire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/jennifer-V-Abrams-155K.jpg\")
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
The newsflash, apparently official, Jennifer Abrams has paid $155,000 to settle-up with Steve Sanson and Veterans In Politics, International (\u201cVIPI\u201d).<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n ABRAMS SETTLES for $155K<\/strong><\/p>\n Moments ago, our editorial staff learned that local attorney, Jennifer V. Abrams, and the Abrams & Mayo Law Firm recently entered into a settlement agreement with Steve Sanson and VIPI. The Abrams Parties agreed to pay $155,000 to resolve the parties\u2019 ongoing litigation. Our editorial staff was informed that Abrams and her firm have already paid the settlement in full\u2014$155k.<\/p>\n The lawsuit is continuing in district court. Attorney Louis Schneider remains as a defendant. After the Nevada Supreme Court almost entirely upheld the district court\u2019s prior decision to grant an anti-SLAPP motion, Schneider sought fees and costs and dismiss the remaining claims. Those motions are still pending.<\/p>\n SANSON SPEAKS!<\/strong><\/p>\n Our editorial staff spoke with Steve Sanson, who explained that the settlement agreement has no confidentiality clause. \u201cWell, Abrams wanted confidentiality, but I said, NO!\u201d explains Sanson, \u201cThis is about freedom of speech and I took an oath to defend the Constitution along with our fundamental liberty interests in freedom of speech. This case started with Jennifer Abrams suing to silence me and the public has an interest in knowing what happens in their Family Courts.\u201d<\/p>\n THE BACKSTORY<\/strong><\/p>\n Abrams is a controversial divorce attorney\u2014who along with her fianc\u00e9e Attorney Marshal Willick, another divorce attorney, is emblematic of the chronic problems that plague the family court.<\/p>\n In early 2017, Sanson criticized abuses in the Clark County Family Courts and declared WAR on it. As part of that war, Sanson published a courtroom video of Abrams\u2019 sketchy courtroom conduct. The video was highly embarrassing for Abrams. Sanson then exposed embarrassing details of a registered sex offender working in Willick\u2019s office.<\/p>\n Sanson was clearly a threat to their family Court racket, so Abrams and Willick retaliated\u2014by filing a defamation lawsuit against Sanson, VIPI, and all its officers! (Holy guacamole!)<\/p>\n Concurrent with filing their lawsuits, they also formed a Facebook group to bully and harass Sanson and his organization VIPI. Part of their strategy to destroy Sanson was to not only attack him personally but to destroy VIPI by bullying and harassing any family court litigants or individuals believed to associate with him personally, attend any of VIPI\u2019s family court protests, or appear on Sanson\u2019s radio program. These \u201cSanson Litigants\u201d, were comprised of victims of the Family Court racket most of whom had been beaten down, destroyed financially, and had their children stolen from them. Ostensibly, they were looking for any help from anyone that would listen.<\/p>\n For some of these litigants, this was understandably the most difficult time of their lives, but it was about to get worse. Willick and Abrams\u2019 online group would harass and \u201cdox\u201d those litigants, posting details of their cases, and tease and belittle those litigants for their appearance or past indiscretions, all while falsely professing to respect the \u201cprivacy\u201d of family court matters. If a family court litigant appeared to be connected to Sanson, the group supported the litigant on another side. In some cases, group members would approach the sometimes desperate for help Sanson Litigants and offer to assist them with their cases. Unfortunately, they were not making these offers to help, but to sabotage those litigants\u2019 cases all so they could publicly laugh about their loss publicly while insinuating that they lost because of their association with Sanson. This was part of an organized strategy to make any association with Sanson toxic.<\/p>\n The group which is now called \u201cNevada Court Watchers\u201d is staffed by employees of Abrams\u2019 law office.<\/p>\n During the litigation, they effectively shut down VIPI and sent false affidavits to his internet service providers shutting down their email and ability to contact their members. The cases hit their apex when Willick in coordination with either vulnerable or corrupt judge arranged a kangaroo hearing where Sanson was falsely accused of attempting to influence a case. The video of this hearing was widely publicized in an effort to further discredit Sanson.<\/p>\n The problem is\u2026 Abrams and Willick knew all along that their lawsuits lacked merit but that wasn\u2019t the point of their lawsuits. They were filed to punish Sanson for exposing and embarrassing them and to discredit and stop him from further exposing abuses by themselves as well as others in the Clark County Family Court. As if they couldn\u2019t be any more transparent, Willick represented Abrams in her lawsuit, and Abrams represented Willick in his lawsuit.<\/p>\n During the most recent 2020 election cycle, Abrams and Willick expanded their efforts with the creation of the NCW PAC, a political action committee to harass judicial candidates that accepted endorsements from VIPI, attended VIPI sponsored debates, or attended VIPI events. Unfortunately, their threats to judicial candidates were believed by many and the public was harmed since these events gave voters an opportunity to learn more about the candidates. NCW PAC\u2019s bullying resulted in one judicial candidate filing for a TPO against Abrams\u2019 employees Mark Diciero and David Schoen.<\/p>\n In the end, Abrams\u2019 lawsuit was held over despite that she had no likelihood of prevailing on her specious defamation claim (and she knew it). She apparently believed that her defamation lawsuit would end Sanson\u2019s criticisms of her shady courtroom conduct. But Abrams never counted on the indomitable fighting spirit of a United States Marine! \u201cOO-rah!\u201d<\/p>\n In response to Abrams\u2019 half-stepping defamation lawsuit, Sanson countered with an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss\u2014and Abrams got knocked out! It was epic! Sanson handed Abrams a stunning upset defeat! Much like the Lakers victory over the Supersonics back in 1989! Unfortunately, the damage to Sanson and VIPI was already done.<\/p>\n THE LITIGATION<\/strong><\/p>\n It was long, arduous litigation. Abrams lost in the trial court, then she appealed, but again, she (almost entirely) lost. It wasn\u2019t even a valiant fight. It was just sad. Some legal observers speculate on whether Abrams was stubbornly prolonging her inevitable defeat\u2014trying to prove a point. If so, the only point is that Abrams paid $155,000 (ouch!). Sanson showed himself to be a noble defender of First Amendment liberties!<\/p>\n In the court, Steve Sanson and VIPI established proved that his criticisms of Abrams\u2019 reprehensible courtroom conduct are free speech\u2014protected by the First Amendment! This means that Sanson has a constitutional right to criticize Abrams\u2014regardless of whether she is offended! Sanson\u2019s triumph over Abrams was a ginormous victory for free speech enthusiasts nationwide!<\/p>\n Sanson added, \u201cI am glad the Nevada Supreme Court correctly ruled that an attorney\u2019s courtroom conduct is a matter of public interest, which we can discuss publicly! With all due respect to Ms. Abrams, she must learn to accept criticisms\u2014especially when they\u2019re valid.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cAnd, I\u2019d like to thank my lawyer, Maggie, McLetchie\u2014a heavy hitter\u2014a First Amendment guru\u2014who always had faith in me,\u201d says Sanson who added, \u201cand I wish to thank her associates, the hard-working Leo Wolpert, and Alina Shell. Without these talented individuals, this landmark decision would not have been possible! I also want to give a shout-out to Anat Levy who always has my back!\u201d<\/p>\n LEGAL SHOCK-WAVES<\/strong><\/p>\n The Nevada Supreme Court ruling in Abrams vs. Sanson has sent shockwaves through the corridors of legal power statewide! The high court precedent is clear and unambiguous. The Nevada Supreme Court wholeheartedly supports free speech!<\/p>\n The VIPI editorial staff spoke with our legal correspondent, T. Matthew Phillips, a First Amendment aficionado, who explained, \u201cWhat we do in life\u2014echoes in eternity.\u201d Phillips added, \u201cWhen Carson City enacted our state\u2019s anti-SLAPP statutes, they had in mind Jenny Abrams\u2019 frivolous lawsuit against Steve Sanson.<\/p>\n Justice was served!\u201d<\/p>\n We were also fortunate to speak with a world-renowned constitutional expert, Maggie McLetchie, who told our staff, \u201cI\u2019m pleased the parties were able to reach an amicable resolution.\u201d<\/p>\n EPILOGUE<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cShe sued me to stifle my free speech,\u201d says Sanson, \u201cand the reason she tried to stifle my free speech was to hide her own misconduct.\u201d Sanson added, \u201cIf you see something, say something, right? So, I see a shyster lawyer, I say something … she files a shyster lawsuit … she gets slapped out of the water! $155 thousand smackeroos! Cha-Ching! Thank you, please come again!\u201d<\/p>\n Our editorial team wondered whether there\u2019s any legal insight that this litigation may offer\u2014as a learning experience. T. Matthew Phillips explained, \u201cNever underestimate your opponent.\u201d Phillips reminds us, \u201cThat\u2019s straight outta Sun-Tzu! Jenny Abrams underestimated a tough-as-nails United States Marine, who basically opened a can of whoop-ass with a side o\u2019 fries and a triple-thick chocolate shake!\u201d<\/p>\n THE WILLICK FACTOR<\/strong><\/p>\n Note also, the legal battle rages on between Sanson and Marshal Willick another divorce attorney. Remarkably, Willick, who is no stranger to committing defamation (see R. Scotlund Vaile v. Marshal S. Willick and Willick Law Group Case No. 6:07-cv-00011, USDC Western District of Virginia Lynchburg Division), pulled the same stunt as his girlfriend, fianc\u00e9e, wife (who knows) Jenny Abrams. And, like his girlfriend, Sanson served up a \u201chow-do-you-do!\u201d<\/p>\n Willick now back-peddles, desperately trying to dismiss his own lawsuit against Sanson.<\/p>\n Their \u201cNevada Court Watchers\u201d harassment group continues to this day essentially as Willick and Abrams\u2019 personal bully squad enforcers, but strangely, while they were previously reporting on every detail of their employers\u2019 lawsuits, the group is strangely silent on Sanson these days, as they are regarding Abrams\u2019 epic defeat of Abrams multiple times at the Supreme Court (represented by Willick) and her six-figure payout to Sanson.<\/p>\n Stay tuned!<\/p>\n VETERANS in POLITICS INTERNATIONAL (\u201cWhere Change Happens!\u201d)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Tags:<\/b> Steve Sanson The post ABRAMS settles for $155K with SANSON!<\/a> appeared first on Financial Market Brief<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The newsflash, apparently official, Jennifer Abrams has paid $155,000 to settle-up with Steve Sanson and Veterans In Politics, International (“VIPI”). ABRAMS SETTLES for $155K Moments ago, our editorial staff learned that local attorney, Jennifer V. Abrams, and the Abrams & Mayo Law Firm recently entered into a settlement agreement with Steve Sanson and […]<\/p>\n The post ABRAMS settles for $155K with SANSON!<\/a> appeared first on Financial Market Brief<\/a>.<\/p>\n\nContact Information:<\/b>
Steve Sanson 702 283 8088 vipipresident@cs.com<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/a>, ReleaseLive<\/a>, Menafn<\/a>, Financial Content<\/a>, IPS<\/a>, Reportedtimes<\/a>, Google News<\/a>, iCN Internal Distribution<\/a>, Extended Distribution<\/a>, English<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\nContact Information:<\/h3>\n
702 283 8088
vipipresident@cs.com<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n