The unofficial record of the United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development. An IPS-Inter Press Service independent publication.

          Terraviva: World Summit on Sustainable Development - Johannesburg
 
Past issues
Johannesburg, 26 August, 2002. Other Stories

 

 

United Nations Radio

 

Terra Viva is an independent publication of IPS-Inter Press Service. The opinions expressed in Terra Viva do not necessarily reflect the editorial views of IPS nor the official position of any of its sponsors.


IPS gratefully acknowledges the financial support received for this publication from:

Commonwealth Foundation
Population Reference Bureau
HIVOS
IPGRI
World Bank
Tierramerica
UNEP
UNDP
Global Cooperation Council


United Nations Radio

WSSD-RUSSIA: NGOs Challenge Tall Claims

by Sergei Blagov

MOSCOW, Aug 21 (IPS) - The Russian government is preparing to paint an upbeat picture of the country's contribution to sustainable development at the world summit in Johannesburg. But non-governmental organisations say the official position lack coherence, and are urging the government to rethink its development priorities.

Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov is expected to travel to the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) to be held in Johannesburg from August 26 to September 4. He is expected to highlight Russia's unique position in global environmental processes.

Russia believes that its natural resources play a significant role in preservation of the environmental equilibrium. It has a quarter of the world's fresh water reserves, and its forests absorb more than 200 million tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere every year, officials say.

The authorities have approved a blueprint for sustainable development called ”Long-term guidelines for national development.” The Kremlin has also worked out a new energy strategy until 2020 that aims at sustainable development of vast hydrocarbon reserves and of the energy sector, while reducing pressure on the environment.

The government says it is keen to fulfil its Rio commitments despite ”serious difficulties of the transition period.” Officials claim that emission of greenhouse gases in Russia has been reduced by 25 per cent compared to 1990, and that protected forest areas have increased 70 per cent since 1992.

Russia has pledged that it will allocate at least 3 per cent of its Gross National Income (GNI) for protection of the environment. But environmentalists say actual disbursements are just 0.01 per cent of GNI.

Russian officials are yet to come up with a comprehensive assessment of the past decade, or with a clear-cut sustainable development strategy for the future, says Olga Ponizova from the Eco-Accord Centre, a Moscow-based non-governmental organisation (NGO). Only such a strategy could give Russia a chance to make a difference in environmental protection, she told IPS.

On the eve of the summit, nine leading NGOs urged the summit to take a critical look at RussiaâÇÖs official pledges. The NGOs, including the Russian units of Greenpeace and the WWF, and the Glasnost Defence Foundation, issued a statement claiming that Russia's environmental policy is unsustainable. The NGOs said the authorities disregard public opinion and did not allow a referendum on environmental policy.

The statement condemned particularly the Natural Resources Ministry for its failure to protect the environment, and said greenhouse emissions had risen since 2000. The authorities see the environment as a mere resource, while environmental protection remains largely on paper, they said.

While claiming a vast increase in the area of protected forests, the government acknowledges that it is losing its timber forests rapidly. The forested area ”borders a state of crisis,” Prime Minister Kasyanov said in June. President Vladimir Putin spoke of the decline of Russia's timber industry, which has contracted sharply over the last decade. Putin said new legislation was needed to protect and manage timber resources. On June 18, the Russian government approved a blueprint for development of the timber sector through 2010. The plan to raise the output of timber four times requires an investment of 20 billion dollars. Officials did not say where the money would come from.

Experts have called for reopening of the forest ministry. President Putin had ordered closure of the 202-year-old Forestry Service in May 2000. Axing of that ministry was among Putin's first decisions, and officials are reluctant to undo it.

Environmentalists question the current arrangement that replaced the forestry service. They argue that the same government agency, the Natural Resources Ministry, should not simultaneously oversee protection of the environment and exploitation of natural resources, because such an arrangement inevitably creates conflict of interests. (END/2002)

SUBSCRIBE!
Enter your email address to receive news updates!
 
"Audio Files"