|
|
POLITICS-US: Heroes or Cowards? Neocons Weigh In on Sailors
Analysis by Khody Akhavi
WASHINGTON, Apr 10, 2007 (IPS) - Name, rank, serial number and sign on the
dotted line.
No sooner had Britain's 15 "kidnapped" sailors and marines returned from
their harrowing "hostage" experience at the hands of Iran than some were
lining up to sell their stories to the British press.
And no sooner had they been accused of "acting like reality TV stars" than
they became a punching bag for U.S. neoconservatives and other right-wing
hawks who cast the sailors' "humiliating" behaviour and their government's
equally "bungled" response as an affront to the Anglosphere and its
interests in the Middle East.
"If there has ever in history been a faster, more humiliating submission
to Stockholm syndrome, we're unaware of it," read an editorial in the New
York Post, a neoconservative daily owned by Australian-born Rupert
Murdoch's News Corporation. "But aren't British service personnel trained
for this sort of thing?"
Mark Steyn, a neoconservative syndicated columnist for the Chicago
Sun-Times, was equally unimpressed when he wrote, "The Queen's Navee had
been demobbed. The token gal was dressed up as an Islamic woman and the 14
men had been kitted out in [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad's
leisurewear."
Apparently, the details of training for hostage situations are kept
secret, according to Britain's Defence Ministry. If the Iranian
government's sophisticated tactics of coercion are any indication, the
training would not have made of much a difference anyway.
Iran used the British sailors - captured in March by members of Iran's
Revolutionary Guard as they patrolled the Shatt al-Arab waterway - as a
propaganda tool. They paraded them in front of Iran's state-run media and
coerced confessions from them. But the British government may have been
just as eager to manipulate Iran's tawdry stunt to their advantage. Their
first step? Cite "exceptional circumstances" and allow the sailors to sell
their version of events to the British media.
However, the window of opportunity to cash in was short-lived, as
Britain's Ministry of Defence on Monday banned any more sailors from
profiting from their captivity. That was after the lone female sailor,
Leading Seaman Faye Turney, 26, reportedly struck deals worth more than
100,000 pounds with British channel ITV1 for her story, and after Arthur
Batchelor, 20, the youngest of the sailors, told the Daily Mirror that he
"cried like a baby" in his prison cell.
"A guard kept flicking my neck with his index finger and thumb. I thought
the worst. We've all seen the videos," said Batchelor in the same
interview, perhaps referring to decapitation videos made by clandestine
terrorist organisations like al Qaeda, the most notorious of which
captured the murders of U.S. businessman Nicholas Berg and Wall Street
Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.
Iran has not been implicated in the creation or distribution of
decapitation videos popularised by Sunni extremist groups.
In response to Britain's vigorous defence that the sailors "acted with
immense courage and dignity," the same New York Post editorial remarked,
"That's just icing on the capitulation cake - adding to a humiliation
that will have consequences far into the future."
It's the consequences of Britain's ostensible "soft power" approach with
Iran that enrage neoconservative columnists like Charles Krauthammer the
most. For him, the "humiliation" suffered by the British is evidence that
the international community and "its great institutions" are a sham, and
that multilateralism is a dead end.
"You want your people back? Go to the [European Union] and get stiffed. Go
to the [U.N.] Security Council and get a statement that refuses even to
'deplore' this act of piracy," he wrote in the Washington Post. "Then turn
to the despised Americans. They'll deal you some cards and bail you out."
With 136 British servicemen and women killed in Iraq, the British
government announced in February a new timetable for withdrawing its
7,000-strong force from the war-torn country. Prime Minister Tony Blair
told the House of Commons that 3,000 of those soldiers will have left
southern Iraq by the end of 2007.
Britain's announcement came as the George W. Bush administration
implemented an increase of 21,100 more U.S. troops to Iraq, and the
standoff between Iran and Britain over the detained sailors has brought a
new complication for Blair, who wants to tiptoe out of Basra before the
situation gets out of hand.
Other neoconservative hawks have seized on Britain's bungling diplomatic
response as an argument for unilateral action and a warning for Iran's
future dealings with the international community with regard to its
nuclear aspirations.
In an op-ed piece in the Financial Times, former U.S. ambassador to the
United Nations John Bolton excoriated the British Foreign Office: "This
passive, hesitant, almost acquiescent approach barely concealed the
Foreign Office's real objective: keeping the faint hope alive that three
years of failed negotiations on Iran's nuclear weapons programme would not
suffer another, this time possibly fatal, setback."
FOX News got in on the act too, framing the debate of the returning
sailors in terms of whether they are heroes or cowards.
"There's no way to put a good face on this, the kissy-face with
Ahmadinejad, the goodie-bags, this was a real failure of leadership." said
Lt. Col. Ralph Peters to Neil Cavuto of FOX. "A U.S. service member would
not accept that goodie bag, wouldn't profusely in front of the cameras
thank the Iranian president."
Lt. Col. Bob Maginnis, another FOX "expert" and contributor to a Christian
radio programme called Jimmy DeYoung's Prophecy Today Weekly, labeled the
British sailors "cowards".
"It looks like Holiday in Tehran... They were standing in front of
Ahmadinejad, and you know they were thanking him for their kind treatment,
for letting them go... He was giving them Persian candy and all sorts of
souvenirs to take home."
But neoconservative CNN talk show pundit Glen Beck summed it up most
eloquently when he proclaimed, "Iran played chicken with the West and we
blinked."
(END)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
What is RSS?
