|
|
POLITICS: U.N., Iraq Clash Over Elections
By Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS, Oct 21, 2004 (IPS) - U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan is at
loggerheads with the U.S.-installed interim government in Iraq over
national elections scheduled to take place in that strife-torn country in
January 2005.
The Iraqi government, backed by the United States, wants Annan to despatch
a huge contingent of U.N. monitors to Iraq's capital Baghdad - primarily
to provide legitimacy to what some observers suggest might evolve into a
truncated election that shuts out voters from insurgency-hit provinces.
But the secretary-general, who has called the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion
of Iraq ''illegal'' and condemned the killings of civilians, is dragging
his feet, refusing to make any commitment.
Responding to Iraqi criticism, Annan told reporters Thursday he does not
plan to send his staff into an increasingly violent Iraq unless there is
''genuine improvement in the security environment or solid arrangements for
the protection of the staff.''
Annan also made clear the United Nations is not ''planning'' or
''organising'' the elections. ''We are offering support and advice. And we
will continue to do that.''
On Wednesday, Iraq Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari was quoted as saying:
''We feel very disappointed that the participation of U.N. employees is not
up to the required level and there is a limited number of officials, and we
are at the end of October.''
The world body now has only 35 international staffers in Iraq, of which six
are election experts. In contrast, the United Nations had more than 600
international employees monitoring elections in Afghanistan last week.
Asked if Iraq should postpone the vote because of the deteriorating
security environment, Annan said: ''It will be their call, not ours.'' The
''ownership'' of the elections belongs to the Iraqis, he added.
So far only one country - Fiji - has pledged to send troops to protect
U.N. staff members in Iraq, despite a Security Council resolution urging
all 191 member states to help provide a military force.
Fiji is sending about 130 troops while Australia has volunteered to provide
logistics and military equipment.
''It will probably take weeks before the Fijians are trained on how to
handle Australian weapons,'' one diplomat told IPS. Judging by the
widespread insurgency, he added, the more important question is, ''who is
going to protect the Fijian force?''
During the last few weeks Iraqi insurgents have raised the level of
violence, including a daily toll of roadside bombings, suicide attacks and
killings of Iraqi civilians, police and national guard who ''collaborate
with the enemy.''
There has also been an increase in kidnappings, mostly of foreigners and
humanitarian workers from relief agencies.
U.S.-led forces continue to respond militarily with helicopter attacks and
aerial bombings of houses believed to harbour insurgents. But in most of
these bombings, the casualties have been civilians.
In September, Annan called the U.S. invasion of Iraq ''illegal,'' provoking
negative reactions both from the White House and from U.S. politicians.
White House Spokeswoman Claire Buchan said U.S. officials disagree with
Annan. ''We previously made clear that coalition forces had authority (to
invade Iraq) under several U.N. resolutions.''
''If Kofi had his way, (Iraqi President) Saddam Hussein would still be in
power,'' said Senator John Cornyn, a member of the U.S. Senate Armed
Services Committee.
Pressure on Annan will grow and criticism of his decisions escalate, say
Middle East experts, human rights activists and U.S. academics.
Yet, it would be ''incredibly damaging'' for the credibility of the United
Nations for Kofi Annan to agree to conduct the Iraq elections in January,
says Michael Ratner, president of the Centre for Constitutional Rights (CCR).
''The country is obviously being torn to pieces and elections in such
circumstances are meaningless. Any participation by the United Nations in
the elections gives them a legitimacy they do not and should not have and
condones the incredible brutal occupation and war,'' Ratner told IPS.
''How Kofi Annan could be even considering this after the killing of so
many U.N. officials makes no sense,'' Ratner added.
After the bombing of the U.N. compound in Baghdad in August 2003, which
claimed the lives of 22 U.N. employees, the United Nations withdrew the
last of its 375 international workers from Iraq.
Ratner said Annan should stand firm and refuse to cave in to ''U.S.
pressure and U.S. power.''
''Kofi Annan has courageously called the war illegal and contrary to the
U.N. Charter; he should continue to stand up to the United States. If he
does not speak out and show some backbone, who will?'' asked Ratner.
Last month the Federation of International Civil Servants' Association
(FICSA) and the Coordinating Committee of Independent Staff Unions and
Associations of the U.N. System (CCISUA) warned Annan against deploying
U.N. employees in Iraq.
In a joint letter they said that not only should no U.N. workers be sent to
Iraq but, ''those already deployed (should) be instructed to leave as soon
as possible.''
''I think Kofi Annan will be under enormous pressure,'' says Margaret
Karns, who teaches courses on international organisations, foreign policy
and diplomacy at the University of Dayton in Ohio State.
Whether or not people agree elections should be held as scheduled in
January (or can be held), no one argues with the importance of the United
Nations playing a central role in organising and running the election
process, and that this process should be well underway by now, she said.
But the kidnapping Wednesday of the head of the relief agency CARE, and the
organisation's withdrawal from Iraq makes it very clear that Baghdad and
other areas are not safe, Karns added.
''Kofi Annan and U.N. personnel will need to be much more receptive to the
importance of security protection. The other alternative is for Annan to
discuss candidly with the Iraqis and the Security Council the question of
whether to defer elections and how to judge when a better time would be,''
Karns told IPS.
''If there is any clear lesson from the Bosnia experience, it is that
elections should not be rushed. Early elections do not contribute to
peacebuilding but may make it more difficult by hardening fracture lines
within a society. Iraq is more similar to Bosnia right now than many people
want to admit, I think,'' she added.
On Monday the U.N. University published a book that also warns early
elections in Iraq might increase violence and extremism in the crippled
country.
Based on studies of previous elections in post-conflict states, the volume,
'The U.N. Role in Promoting Democracy', recommends that two years should
elapse in such societies before polls are held.
''It is obvious that the United States is yet again putting pressure on the
secretary-general to allow the international organisation to be an integral
part of U.S. foreign policy,'' says As'ad AbuKhalil, associate professor of
political science at California State University.
But Annan has to be concerned about the safety of U.N. staff: he still
bears responsibility for what befell U.N. offices in Baghdad as he rushed
to facilitate the U.S. occupation plan, he added.
''Annan has to be cautious this time as he worries about the further
erosion in U.N. standing in the Middle East,'' AbuKhalil told IPS.
The U.N. chief has recently been issuing reports about Syrian intervention
in Lebanon, while U.S. fighter jets bomb civilian neighbourhoods in
Baghdad, he added.
''The irony may be missed in the U.S. press, but not in the Middle East
press, where the United Nations is seen as a mere tool of U.S. foreign
policy,'' said AbuKhalil, author of 'The House of Bush and the House of Saud'.
Annan should insist on U.S. withdrawal of troops, and the deployment of a
real international force representing countries that did not participate in
the U.S.-led war and occupation of Iraq, he added.
Otherwise, he ''will go down in history as the secretary-general who has
helped in the erosion of U.N. credibility and effectiveness,'' AbuKhalil said.
(END)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
What is RSS?
