|
|
POLITICS: U.N. Rejects Private Peacekeepers
By Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS, Aug 27 (IPS) - As the United Nations continues to face a
shortage of well-equipped, professionally trained soldiers for its growing
peacekeeping operations overseas, a proposal to hire private security
forces to rectify the shortfall has been greeted with scepticism.
''There is little or no support for the privatisation of U.N.
peacekeeping,'' says a senior U.N. official, speaking on condition of
anonymity. ''I cannot think of any member state willing to go along with
the proposal,'' he told IPS.
A proposal to double the current peacekeeping force in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo (DRC), from 10,800 to about 23,900, and the
possibility of a new 10,000-strong U.N. mission in Sudan are expected to
bolster the total number of U.N. peacekeepers from 59,000 to over 82,000.
But most western states remain reluctant to provide peacekeepers, mostly
for political and security reasons, abdicating the role of peacekeeping
mostly to developing nations.
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan complained in 2003 that although these
countries have the world's best-equipped military forces, they have refused
to actively participate in peacekeeping operations.
Last November, the London 'Financial Times' said Annan was exploring the
possibility of hiring private security forces for U.N. peacekeeping
missions as a means of resolving the problem.
In anticipation of this, the paper said, at least one British security firm
was building a database of some 5,000 former soldiers who would be
available to work for the United Nations at short notice.
But David Harland of the U.N. Department of Peacekeeping Operations told
IPS the privatisation of U.N. peacekeeping was not on any agenda.
Asked if the peacekeepers who were killed in Kosovo in April this year were
from private security firms, as originally reported, he said they were
''seconded for service'' by member states.
The shooting incident in the town of Mitrovica left three international
police officers dead and almost a dozen others wounded, 10 of who were U.S.
correctional officers while the 11th was an Austrian civilian police
officer. But none was from any private security firm.
As of July, the 10 largest troop contributors to U.N. operations were from
developing nations: Pakistan (8,544 troops), Bangladesh (7,163), Nigeria
(3,579), Ghana (3,341), India (2,934), Ethiopia (2,863), South Africa
(2,480), Uruguay (1,962), Jordan (1,864), and Kenya (1,831).
In contrast, the number of troops from western nations averaged less than
600. The largest contributors were United Kingdom (567 troops), Canada
(564), France (561), Ireland (479), and the United States (427).
Of the 16 U.N. peacekeeping missions, seven are in Africa: Burundi (since
June 2004); Cote d'Ivoire (since April 2004); Liberia (since September
2003); Ethiopia/Eritrea (since July 2000); Democratic Republic of Congo
(since November 1999); Sierra Leone (since October 1999); and Western
Sahara (since April 1991).
Last April, U.S. President George W Bush approved a plan to train about
75,000 soldiers, mostly from Africa, over a five-year period for peacekeeping.
The Bush administration, which has called the project 'the Global Peace
Operations Initiative', has committed some 660 million dollars to build
peacekeeping capacity.
''This is meant to expand worldwide capacity that could be used by the
United Nations or by others,'' said Douglas Feith, under-secretary-general
for policy at the U.S. department of defence.
Feith told reporters ''there was not enough capacity in the world to deal
with the requirements. Other countries have shown an interest in building
up their peacekeeping forces, but they need help.''
But Peter W Singer of the Brookings Institution warns the international
humanitarian community to be cautious about its dealings with private
security forces.
''The emergence of a global trade in hired military services, better known
as the 'privatised military industry', is one of the most interesting
developments in warfare over the last decade,'' he writes in the current
issue of 'Humanitarian Affairs Review', a quarterly journal of global
policy issues published in Belgium.
These firms, he says, now operate in over 50 countries, helping win
conflicts in Angola, Croatia, Ethiopia-Eritrea and Sierra Leone.
From 1994 to 2000, the U.S. defence department alone entered into over
3,000 contracts with U.S.-based firms, which provided goods and services
estimated at a value of more than 300 billion dollars. The Canadian
military, Singer adds, recently privatised its supply chain to the British
firm, Tibbett and Britten.
But the work of the privatised military industry is not limited to
governments, because clients have included rebel groups, drug cartels and
humanitarian non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
Singer says no example better illustrates the industry's growing activity
than the war in Iraq, where private military contractors handled everything
- from feeding and housing coalition troops to maintaining the most
sophisticated weapons systems.
He warns that the presence of these firms might jeopardise norms of
neutrality among aid groups and lead to a further multiplication of armed
forces on the ground.
''In the end, meeting humanitarian needs with private military solutions is
not necessarily a terrible or impossible thing,'' Singer writes. ''But, it
clearly carries both advantages and disadvantages that must constantly be
weighed and mitigated through effective policy and smart business sense.''
In this most essential public realm, where people's lives are at stake, he
argues, ''we must be doubly sure of our dealings with private industry.''
''We should not let our frustrations lead us down the dangerous path of
privatisation without due consideration,'' Singer says.
(END)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
What is RSS?
