Tuesday, February 09, 2010   19:45 GMT    
IPS Direct to Your Inbox!
 - Africa
 - Asia-Pacific
     Afghanistan
     Iran
 - Caribbean
      Haiti
 - Europe
      Union in Diversity
 - Latin America
 - Mideast &
   Mediterranean
      Iraq
      Israel/Palestine
 - North America
      Neo-Cons
      Bush's Legacy
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Subscribe
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
 - Development
      MDGs
      City Voices
      Corruption
 - Civil Society
 - Globalisation
 - Environment
      Energy Crunch
      Climate Change
      Tierramérica
 - Human Rights
 - Health
      HIV/AIDS
 - Indigenous Peoples
 - Economy & Trade
 - Labour
 - Population
     Reproductive Rights
     Migration&Refugees
 - Arts &
          Entertainment
 - Education
 - In Focus
Languages
   ENGLISH
   ESPAÑOL
   FRANÇAIS
   ARABIC
   DEUTSCH
   ITALIANO
   JAPANESE
   NEDERLANDS
   PORTUGUÊS
   SUOMI
   SVENSKA
   SWAHILI
IPS Inter Press Service News Agency
PrintSend to a friend
POLITICS: Ethiopia, Eritrea Under International Pressure to Normalise Ties
By Sonny Inbaraj

ADDIS ABABA, Sep 19, 2003 (IPS) - International pressure is mounting on Ethiopia and Eritrea to normalise ties, three years after the end of a bloody war, following the UN Security Council's renewal of the six-month mandate of its peacekeeping mission in both countries.

The Security Council resolution, passed late last week, that renewed the mandate of UNMEE - the United Nations Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea - called on the two warring Horn of Africa nations to settle their differences through dialogue.

In his report to the Security Council, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said Ethiopia and Eritrea would have to come to terms with the fact that they "are destined by geography to remain neighbours, and that normalisation of relations, while difficult, will be to the great benefit of both countries and their peoples."

Annan also added UN resources were scarce and peacekeepers were needed elsewhere in Africa.

The Ethiopian-Eritrean war between 1998 and 1999 was the biggest in the world at the time, clearly surpassing the Kosovo war in the number of casualties, troops involved and displaced civilians. The number of dead and wounded was estimated at 100,000 with an involvement of about half a million troops and the displacement of about 600,000 civilians.

As at the end of July, UNMEE had 4,000 UN troops, including some military observers deployed in a 25-kilometre wide buffer area, called the Temporary Security Zone, or TSZ, between the two states.

"The pressure is certainly on (both nations) and hopefully we should be able see some momentum," said George Sommerwill, UNMEE's deputy spokesperson.

"Pressure, too, is coming from the donors and it is in the interest of all parties that some form of dialogue takes place soon," added Sommerwill.

But the heart of the matter is the border town of Badme, where the war first started. The town is currently under Ethiopian administration, but under the ruling by the Ethiopia-Eritrea Boundary Commission (EEBC) - made in April last year - the town lies in Eritrea.

Both Ethiopia and Eritrea committed themselves to be bound by the decision of the EEBC in the border demarcation between the two countries, as spelled out in the Algiers Agreement which ended the war in Dec. 2000.

After being postponed twice, the demarcation of the 1,000-kilometre border is scheduled to begin next month.

A crucial meeting between senior Ethiopian and Eritrean military officials, under the auspices of the Military Coordination Commission and chaired by the Force Commander of UNMEE, was held on Wednesday in Kenya's capital Nairobi.

"The peace process is now at a crucial stage but the peacekeeping mission, although so far successful, was worth nothing without demarcation," said UNMEE Force Commander Major-General Robert Gordon in a statement, made available to IPS.

But the EEBC decision has not gone down well with Ethiopia and the loss of Badme has been taken quite badly.

In his report to the UN Security Council, Annan cited incidents in August in which "Ethiopian militia pointed their weapons at UNMEE patrols in response to advice not to enter the TSZ."

Annan stressed that "even more important" than curbing the incursions was that the two sides "proceed with expeditious demarcation of the border."

In Addis Ababa, however, opposition parties are threatening to stage demonstrations against the Ethiopia-Eritrea Boundary Commission's ruling and have accused the government of Meles Zenawi of giving away Badme.

"The decision of the Boundary Commission does not serve the interests of Ethiopia in general and the border-inhabiting Ethiopians in particular," said Beyene Petros of the newly-formed United Ethiopian Democratic Forces.

"This decision does not guarantee peace," Petros told reporters.

But the United States and Japan, two of the largest donors in the region, have started to turn the screws on Ethiopia.

Washington foots more that 500 million U.S. dollars in the UN Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea's peacekeeping costs and is fed-up with delays in the border demarcation.

U.S. Congressmen are proposing a resolution calling for economic sanctions against whichever country that blocks progress towards peace. The Ethiopian embassy in Washington is clearly worried, and has issued a rebuttal of the resolution.

Meanwhile, a senior adviser to the Japanese Foreign Ministry said both Ethiopia and Eritrea would have to work out their own problems first before approaching Tokyo for help in post-conflict development.

"We do not understand the situation between Ethiopia and Eritrea fully, because it has a very long history. But they have to work out the solutions on their own before they ask us for help," said Keitaro Sato, the ambassador in charge of conflict and refugee-related issues at the Japanese Foreign Ministry.

"Our message to the people or governments is that it is futile for them to fight. It is our firm stand that we cannot help a country that is involved in conflict. That is the case, for instance, with Sudan where we have stopped development assistance to that country for a long time," Sato told 'The Reporter' weekly. (END)

Send your comments to the editor

 
 
 
 
RSS News Feeds RSS/XML
Make as home Make IPS News your homepage!
Free Newsletters Free Email Newsletters
IPS Mobile IPS Mobile
Text Only Text Only
Related Topics
  Africa
  East Africa
Obama: A New Era?
Financial Meltdown