Owl launched its LTE-connected dashboard camera<\/a> back in 2018, giving users a raft of in-car security functions for $99 a year. Now — with very little warning — the company has bumped its yearly subscription fee to $215 a year. And according to Android Police<\/em><\/a>’s Richard Gao, Owlcam owners trying to use their devices without LTE connectivity are finding their cameras completely disabled.<\/p>\n Gao reports that he received an email from Owl in May, notifying him that Owlcam has been bought out by GPS and IoT company CallPass. Nowhere in that email — nor in the six subsequent emails he received — was there any mention of the new, dramatically higher pricing, nor any indication that users would have their devices bricked should they not subscribe. In one email, the company says that CallPass will not support WiFi only mode, while in another it says, “If you don’t subscribe on or before May 31st your camera will move to Wi-Fi only mode.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Furthermore, in order for CallPass to troubleshoot device issues, owners will have <\/em>to subscribe to an LTE plan. As one user reports<\/a>, it wasn’t until they mentioned legal action that CallPass said the subscription cost could be refunded within seven days — but only if they can’t remedy the WiFi issue. Understandably, users are angry at the abrupt and confusing changes, and as Gao says, customer service doesn’t appear to be much help either, with support slow on both phone and email.<\/p>\n Even at the outset, Owlcam was pricey. The camera itself cost $349 with a year of LTE built into the price. The subsequent $99 a year (or $10 a month) was a lot of money to pay for a dashcam after the initial outlay, but its security-focused features made it worth it for a lot of users. But even the most ardent Owlcam fans will have a hard time justifying the new pricing structure of $215 a year (or $20 a month). As Gao notes, users will now have unlimited access to live video viewing, video history and clips creation, but few would say that explains such a massive price hike.<\/p>\n The situation is not unlike that of Wink’s, earlier this year. The smart home device maker essentially gave customers one week to subscribe to a service they had already paid for, or face being cut off<\/a>. At least in Wink’s case the company made clear what was happening — CallPass\/Owlcam’s affair has been very poorly communicated to customers, who are rightly unhappy that they’re being made to jump through hoops to access a service they’d already paid for in good faith. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n Tags:<\/b> Rachel England<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Contact Information:<\/b>
Rachel England<\/p>\n
<\/a>, Wire<\/a>, United States<\/a>, English<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Contact Information:<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/icrowdnewswire.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/4001-logo-892.png\"){kind=logo}
Big changes have been implemented abruptly. Owl launched its LTE-connected dashboard camera back in 2018, giving users a raft of in-car security functions for $99 a year. Now — with very little warning — the company has bumped its yearly subscription fee to $215 a year. And according to Android Police’s Richard Gao, Owlcam owners trying to use … Continue reading Owlcam’s new owner more than doubles the price of its annual LTE dashcam fee<\/span><\/a> Continue Reading
<\/p>\n